Anomaly in Computation of Pension – SC Judgement

Anomaly in Computation of Pension – SC Judgement 

Anomaly in computation of Pension Civil Appeal No. 5525 of 2012, Filed in the Hon`ble Supreme Court of India by Bank of Baroda & Ors with other Civil Appeals 

HR & INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 
No.HR&IR/2018-19/G2/4786 
April 3, 2018 

Chief Executives of Member Banks which 
are parties to the 7th Bipartite Settlement 

Dear Sir, 

Anomaly in computation of Pension Civil Appeal No. 5525 of 2012, Filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by Bank of Baroda & Ors with other Civil Appeals. 
anomaly-in-computation-of-pension-sc

On 9-10-1993, a Bi-partite Settlement was signed at Industry level between Indian Banks’ Association (representing member Banks) and Workmen Unions (representing Workmen) under the provisions of Industrial Dispute Act, 1947 for introduction of Pension as a second retiral benefit in lieu of “Banks contribution to Provident fund.” On similar lines a Joint Note dated 29-10-1993 between Indian Banks’ Association (representing member Banks) and Officers Associations (representing Officers) was signed. 

2. The respective member Banks in exercise of their power under Section 19 of Banking Companies (Acquisition & transfer of undertakings) Act, 1970/1980 pursuant to above referred Bi-partite Settlement/Joint Note, framed and notified in the Gazette of India “Bank Employees Pension Regulations, 1995.” 

3. Another Joint Note/Bi-partite Settlement was signed between respective parties as mentioned herein above on 14-12-1999 and 27-3-2000 respectively relating to Wage revision. As per the provisions of said Joint Note / Bi-partite Settlement, 1684 points of Consumer Price Index (CPI) were merged with existing basic pay of Officers/employees and revised basic pay was worked out accordingly. However, as per agreed terms & conditions, pay for the purpose of pension was worked out after merging 1616 points of CPI as against 1684 points. These provisions were made effective w.e.f. 1-4-1998. As such, pay for the purpose of pension was less than the actual Pay the Employee/Officer concerned was getting on or after 1-4-1998. This anomaly was removed vide Joint Note/Bi-partite Settlement signed on 2-6-2005. However, monetary benefits were given w.e.f. 1-5-2005. 

4. Due to this anomaly, the employees/Officers who retired after 1-4-1998, including those who retired under Special Voluntary Retirement Scheme, 2000 filed various Writ Petitions before different Hon’ble High Courts, praying that they be held entitled to Payment of Pension on the basis of actual average pay drawn by them during last 10 months as per the provisions of Bank Employees Pensions Regulations, 1995. 

5. When the matter came up before Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka and Madras, the Hon’ble Courts decided the matter against Banks and ultimately concerned Banks approached Hon’ble Supreme Court by filing Civil Appeals viz., CA No 5525/2012, 6254/2012, 5611/2012, 3026-3253/2013, 3257-3262/2013, 11205-11340/2014, 11342-11435/2014, 9533-9646/2014, 8557/2014, 4711-4800/2014 and 1880/2018, 1881-1888/2018, 1890/2018, 1892-1912/2018, 1918/2018, 1919-2087 and 2088-2092/2018. 

6. The Hon’ble Supreme Court vide its order dated 13/2/2018 (copy enclosed) have dismissed these appeals filed by the Banks and inter-alia has held that:- 

“17…the provisions contained in Regulation 35 also make an incumbent entitled for opting the pension on the basis of average emoluments. The average emoluments have to be calculated on the basis of the preceding ten months. Adding Explanation (c) to Regulation 2(s), as done, could have created no fictional basis in view of clear and unambiguous provisions in other provisions of the Regulations. Besides, the definition of the average emoluments in Regulation 2(d) itself makes it clear that it is average pay drawn “during the last ten months” of his service by an employee. It cannot mean pay drawn by the employee even before several years. Mentionably there is no amendment made in the aforesaid provision of Regulation 2(d) and the expression during the preceding last ten months before date of retirement is clearly culled out in Regulation 38(1) and 38(2). Thus, in our considered opinion, the view taken by the then Chief Justice Vikramajit Sen as he then was, at Karnataka High Court and by the High Court of Madras are appropriate and the view taken by the Delhi High Court cannot be said to be sustainable for the various other reasons too mentioned hereinafter. 

29. Thus, in our opinion, the Regulations which were in force till 2003, would apply with full force and as a matter of fact, the amendments made in it by addition of Explanation (c) in Regulation 2(s) did not have the effect of amending the Regulations relating to pension, as contained in Regulation 38 read with Regulations 2(d) and 35 of the Regulations of 1995. Even otherwise, if it had the effect of amending the pay and perks ‘average emoluments’, as specified in Regulation 2(d), it could not have operated retrospectively and taken away accrued rights. Otherwise also, it would have been arbitrary exercise of power. Besides, there was no binding statutory force of the so called Joint Note of the Officers’ Association, as admittedly, to Officers’ Association even the provisions of Industrial Disputes Act were not applicable and Joint note had no statutory support, and it was not open to forgo the benefits available under the Regulations to those officers who have retired from 1.4.1998 till December 1999 and thereafter, and to deprive them of the benefits of the Regulations. Thus, by the Joint Note that has been relied upon, no estoppel said to have been created. There is no estoppel as against the enforcement of statutory provisions. The Joint Note had no force of law and could not have been against the spirit of the statutory Regulations and the basic service conditions, as envisaged under the Regulations framed under the Act of 1970. They could not have been tinkered with in an arbitrary manner, as has been laid down by this Court in Central Inland Water Transport Corporation Limited & Anr. vs. Brojo Nath Ganguly & Anr., (1986) 3 SCC 156 & Delhi Transport Corporation vs D.T.C. Mazdoor Congress, (1991) Supp.1 SCC 600. 

33. The only purpose of the addition of Explanation (c) to Regulation 2(s), was to take away the actual computation of the pension on the basis of the salary, which was drawn in the preceding ten months. Thus, we have to hesitation to strike it down being arbitrary and repugnant to other provisions/Regulations namely 2(d), 38(1)(2) and 35. The Explanation (c) to Regulation 2(s) is hereby struck down, as it could not have been enacted retrospectively to take away accrued rights. Even otherwise also it is held to be arbitrary and irrational. More so, in view of the fact that only by way of a temporary measure, that discrimination was created and the Explanation was deleted with effect from 1.5.2005.” 

34. Thus, we set aside the judgment rendered by the High Court of Delhi and affirm that of High Courts of Karnataka at Bangalore and the High Court of Madras. The appeals filed by the Banks are dismissed and the appeal filed by the Association is allowed. Resultantly, let the amount which was due and payable be paid with 9% interest, be calculated and paid within four months from today. 

35. All pending applications stand disposed of.” 

7. The matter was put up to the Managing Committee of IBA in its meeting held on 28.3.2018. The committee resolved that the judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court may be forwarded to all member banks which are party to above mentioned Joint Note / Bipartite Settlement for their necessary action. As such, a copy of the judgement of Hon’ble Supreme Court is enclosed. 

8. As directed by Managing Committee we have taken a Legal Opinion to know the impact of the judgement on various Banks which is given below: 

(a) All Nationalized Banks who have Pension Regulations, 1995 will have to give effect to the judgement and pay the differential arrears in the amount of Pension which was due and payable with 9% interest within 4 months from the date of judgement i.e. 13.02.2018. 

(b) Banks incorporated under special statutes will also have to give effect to the judgement if they have implemented provisions of the above mentioned Joint Note / 7th Bipartite Settlement. 

(c) Private Banks which are not amenable to the Writ jurisdiction of the Hon’ble High Courts/Supreme Court, though can take the plea that captioned judgement is not applicable to them, should also give effect and comply with the captioned judgement if they have implemented provisions of the above mentioned Joint Note/7th Bipartite Settlement. The view expressed in this point Is based on the possibility that if the employees of the Private Banks approach the Civil Court on the basis of said Hon’ble Supreme Court judgement, they would procure a favourable verdict. 

Yours faithfully, 
B Raj Kumar 
Deputy Chief Executive 

Authority: http://www.iba.org.in/ 

COMMENTS

Defence$type=complex$count=4$ico=1

7th CPC$type=list$m=0$cate=0$sn=0$rm=0$c=5

Name

'Aaykar Setu' mobile app,1,5th cpc,5,6th cpc,8,7th CPC,399,7th CPC Arrears,4,7th CPC Arrers,8,7th CPC Hindi News,12,7th CPC News,69,7th Pay Commission,214,Aadhaar,23,acpin,1,ad-hoc bonus,4,ad-hoc staff,1,additional hra,1,admit card,1,advance salary,1,AGEY,1,aicpin,9,aigdsu news,5,AIIMS,2,ailtc railways,7,aipr,3,Air Force,13,Air India,5,air india ltc 80 fare,4,Air Travel,6,Aircel,1,airf,15,Airlines,1,Airtel,4,alcohol policy,1,all india,5,Allowances,125,Amazon Ofers,1,Andhra Pradesh,1,anomaly committee,1,aoc,1,app download,1,Apple iPhone,3,Assam,4,Assistant Jobs,1,Bank,29,bank da,3,bank holidays,1,Bank Policies,19,banknotes,1,Bihar,9,Bihar 7th CPC,3,bihar govt employee,1,Bollywood,4,bonous,1,bonus,6,breakdown allowance,2,Breaking News,139,BRICS,1,Bsnl,11,budget,4,Business,84,ca exam pattern,1,Cabinet News,41,cadre restructuring,2,cadre review,11,CAG Report,3,CAPO News,4,Career,56,casual labour,3,casual leave,2,cat Judgement,2,cat order,3,CBDT,12,CBEC,4,CBSE,6,ccs master circular,1,ccs pension rules,2,ccs rules,4,cda rules,2,cgda,18,cgegis table,5,CGHS,86,cghs agartala,1,cghs ahmedabad,1,cghs allahabad,1,cghs bengaluru,2,cghs bhopal,1,cghs bhubaneswar,1,cghs chandigarh,1,Cghs Chennai,1,cghs dehradun,1,cghs delhi,3,cghs guwahati,1,cghs hyderabad,1,cghs indore,1,cghs jabalpur,1,cghs jaipur,1,cghs kanpur,2,cghs karnataka,1,cghs kerala,1,cghs kolkata,1,cghs lucknow,1,cghs meerut,2,cghs mumbai,1,cghs nagpur,1,cghs patna,2,cghs pune,1,cghs ranchi,2,cghs shillong,1,cghs trivandrum,2,cghs uttrakhand,1,chandigarh,1,chhattisgarh,1,child care leave,2,children education allowance,7,China,1,cisf,1,come & play scheme,1,compassionate ground appointment,2,Compensation Policy,3,composite allowance,1,condiment allowance,3,Condiment expenditure,2,consatant attendance allowance,1,contract labour,7,Conveyance Allowance,3,cpao order,21,cpf,1,cpgrams,3,cpiiw,3,cpse,68,cpse employees,7,cpse guidelines,29,cpse pay revision,2,cpse pension,5,CPSEs Pay,20,Cricket,4,cris,3,CRPF,1,CS(MA) Rules,5,csd,2,csd price list,1,Current Affairs,308,cvc circular,2,d el ed,1,daily officiating allowance,3,dearness allowances,48,dearness relief,18,Defence,221,Delhi,2,delhi high court,1,dept of post order,40,deputation,3,deputation allowance,4,desw,2,desw order,5,disability pension,5,Doctor Jobs,12,doe order,24,doppw order,7,DoPT Order,119,dot order,10,Download MedWatch App,1,Download MyMSME App,1,Download MyMSME App Celebrating Yoga,1,Download NEW ITR FORM,2,Download Swachh Bharat App,1,dpe om,33,dress allowance,5,dress code,1,EC,1,echs,21,ecil,1,EDUACTION,75,Education,7,educational qualification,1,Egineer Jobs,1,Election Commission,1,Employment,6,Entertainment,2,EPFO,23,ESIC,4,EVM,1,Ex-Servicemen,6,exam,2,exempt from tax,1,expected da,10,extra work allowance,1,Extraordinary Pension,1,Facebook,8,fact jobs,1,Family Pension,94,FAQ,2,Featured,79,festivals,1,FIFA,1,File ITR,22,Fin Min Orders,62,Finance,8,Fixed Medical Allowance,7,Flipkart,2,Football,3,FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS ON GST,1,Games,12,Ganes,2,gazette notification,12,gdce instructions,3,gds arrears,9,gds da,11,gds employees news,17,gds pay,15,gds report,17,gfr,1,GOI News,570,Goods and Services Tax,50,Goods and Services Tex,1,Google,10,government of karnataka,1,Govt Jobs,10,govt of assam,2,govt of assam pensioner,1,govt of assam staff,1,govt of chhattisgarh,1,Govt Project,324,Govt Staff News,1107,Govt Yojna,255,gpf interest rate,1,GPF Rules,12,GPRA,4,gratuity,6,group A,1,Group D,1,Gst,60,GST Rates Finder app,1,Hardship Allowance,1,Haryana Govt Employees,2,Haryana Govt order,2,hba rules,8,Health,25,High Court Judgement,2,high court order,2,hill area allowance,1,holiday list,9,Hollywood,2,honorarium,1,hpca,1,hr allowances,1,hra,2,HRA Allowances,40,iba,5,iba dr,1,ibps,2,icsil,1,ida cpse,15,income tax,20,independence day,1,India,3,India Post,12,Indian Airforce,49,Indian Army,68,Indian Navy,63,indian railway,10,IOCL Jobs,1,IRCTC,8,irtsa,2,Island Special Duty Allowance,1,ISRO,1,iti ltd,1,ITR,30,j&k govt employees,3,j&k govt pensioners,1,Japan,1,Jharkhand,3,Jio News,8,jkssb,1,jnv,7,Jobs,54,Jobs News,93,karnataka,1,kerala,4,Kerala Govt Employees,3,Kerala Govt Pensioners,2,Kolkata,1,KVS,40,kvs pension,2,labour Bureau,7,larsgess scheme,3,Latest,988,ldce,3,leave rules,1,lic pay,2,life time arrear,1,Lok Sabha,136,LTC,32,ltc 80 air fare,6,Ltd Company Jobs,2,mAadhaar App,2,macp,31,Make in India,2,Market,1,Maruti Suzuki Dzire,1,maternity leave,6,medical card,1,Medical claims,4,Meghalaya Govt Employees,1,MERIT app,1,mes,1,MGNREGA,2,mha,1,mhfw order,14,mhrd order,1,Microsoft,1,Microsoft News,1,minimum wages,7,mod order,17,mohfw order,1,monetary allowance,3,MP,1,msp,2,mtnl,2,NABARD,1,Namami Gange,5,National,705,ncjcm,20,nda,2,ndmc,1,New Delhi,3,new TRCA matrix,5,nfir,59,NGT,1,night duty allowance,2,northern railway,1,Notification,1,npci,1,nps,21,nursing allowance,2,nursing perssonsel,2,NVS,9,odisha,3,odisha govt pensioner,1,operation theater allowance,1,ordnance factory,1,orop,16,overtime allowance,6,PAN,6,pass rules,3,Passports,1,patna high court judgement,1,pay fixation,18,pcda circular,40,pco allowance,2,pdca circular,8,Pension,199,Pension Adalat,1,Pension Adalat Application Form,2,Pension faq,20,Pension revision,8,Pensioner,156,Pensioner associations,2,Pensioner Portal,12,pfrda,3,pgportal,3,pl bonous,12,PM Modi,27,PMAY,5,PMUY,1,PMVVY,1,Policies,382,Politics,35,post graduate allowance,1,post office,2,prcp in railway,4,President,2,Project Allowance,2,Promotions,19,Promotions policy,18,provisional pension,2,puducherry,1,Railway,344,railway servants pass rules,1,rajasthan govt employees,2,rajasthan govt pensioners,1,rajbhasha,1,Rajya Sabha,38,Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana,1,ration money allowance,2,RBI,11,Real Madrid,1,Recruitment,6,recruitment rules,9,relhs,1,remote area allowance,1,remuneration,1,RERA Act,1,reservation criteria,10,rest rules,1,Result,5,retirement age,1,revised pay,24,revised pay matrix table,5,revised pension,3,revised vda,7,rilways,1,risk and hardship allowance,7,running staff,2,RUSA,1,s,1,SAARTHI App,1,SBI,10,SBI Rules,6,scholarship,1,Science,17,scova meeting,1,SEVA App,1,Seventh Central Pay Commission,149,SKILL INDIA Mission,1,small saving scheme,2,special allowance,3,Special LC Gate allowance,1,Sports,16,ssc jos,1,status of PPOs,2,storekeeping staff,1,strike,2,study allowance,1,study leave,1,Sukanya Samriddhi Account,2,Supreme Court,22,Supreme Court Judgement,11,Survey,1,syllabus,1,syndicate bank,1,Tarang Sanchar,1,Tax,22,tds deduction,1,teacher jobs,2,Tech,34,Telangana,1,telangana govt employees,1,Telcome,2,Telcome News,8,timely disposal of applications,1,TN Govt Employees,3,TN Govt Pensioners,2,tnusrb recruitment,1,Trade,1,trade unions,1,TRAI,1,training allowance,2,Transfer policy,25,transport allowance,4,Travelling Allowance,22,Trending Now,131,tripura govt employees,1,tripura govt pensioner,1,Trump,1,uan,1,Uber,1,ugc,1,uidai,1,UJALA Scheme,1,UP CM Yogi Adityanath,2,upgradation of pay,2,uppsc,1,UPSC Jobs,2,USA,2,Uttar Pradesh,3,vrs,2,Weather,2,West Bengal,1,Whatsapp,2,Windows 10 OS,1,World,62,World Press Freedom Day,1,You Tube,2,
ltr
item
Param News: Central Government Employee News|Latest DOPT OM: Anomaly in Computation of Pension – SC Judgement
Anomaly in Computation of Pension – SC Judgement
Anomaly in computation of Pension Civil Appeal No. 5525 of 2012, Filed in the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India by Bank of Baroda & Ors with other Civil Appeals.
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AosmZsUo6CM/Ws2Mqf2FggI/AAAAAAAAGXc/IhTK7_maAuADXjESXkgZD0FGbj4al4ZjwCLcBGAs/s1600/anomaly-in-computation-of-pension-sc.png
https://3.bp.blogspot.com/-AosmZsUo6CM/Ws2Mqf2FggI/AAAAAAAAGXc/IhTK7_maAuADXjESXkgZD0FGbj4al4ZjwCLcBGAs/s72-c/anomaly-in-computation-of-pension-sc.png
Param News: Central Government Employee News|Latest DOPT OM
https://www.paramnews.com/2018/04/anomaly-in-computation-of-pension-sc.html
https://www.paramnews.com/
http://www.paramnews.com/
http://www.paramnews.com/2018/04/anomaly-in-computation-of-pension-sc.html
true
2671314941044517342
UTF-8
Loaded All Posts Not found any posts VIEW ALL Readmore Reply Cancel reply Delete By Home PAGES POSTS View All RECOMMENDED FOR YOU LABEL ARCHIVE SEARCH ALL POSTS Not found any post match with your request Back Home Sunday Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat January February March April May June July August September October November December Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec just now 1 minute ago $$1$$ minutes ago 1 hour ago $$1$$ hours ago Yesterday $$1$$ days ago $$1$$ weeks ago more than 5 weeks ago Followers Follow THIS PREMIUM CONTENT IS LOCKED STEP 1: Share. STEP 2: Click the link you shared to unlock Copy All Code Select All Code All codes were copied to your clipboard Can not copy the codes / texts, please press [CTRL]+[C] (or CMD+C with Mac) to copy